Migration  Phases

Migrating to Mule 4 can bring several benefits to an organization, including improved performance, scalability, security, and connectivity. However, a migration project requires careful planning and execution to ensure a smooth and successful transition. This document defines  a step-by-step approach to discovering and assessing the migration journey:

Phase 1: Discovery and Assessment

The discovery and assessment phase is a critical step that involves evaluating the current environment against a set of key indicators, and identifying the requirements and constraints of the migration.

• Identify the business drivers for the migration

Identify the business drivers for the migration, including the goals and objectives of the migration, the expected benefits, and any risks or challenges that need to be addressed.

• Discover the current environment

Start by discovering the current environment, including the version of MuleSoft being used, the integrations that are currently in place, and any other relevant information about the existing infrastructure.

• Assess the impact on existing integrations

Assess the impact of the migration on existing integrations, including any potential changes to the API contracts, data models, and message formats. This will help to identify any required changes to the existing integrations.

• Identify the required changes

Identify the changes that need to be made to the existing integrations, including any required updates to connectors, message processors, and error handling. This may also involve updating the code to conform to the new programming model of Mule 4.

Phase 2: Define a Strategy

Before embarking on a MuleSoft 4 migration, it is essential to define a strategy that outlines the goals, objectives, and approach of the migration. The strategy phase will result in a well-defined plan that outlines the migration approach, timeline, resource requirements, and expected outcomes. A well-defined strategy provides a solid foundation for the migration project.

• Develop a migration plan

Develop a migration plan that outlines the approach, timeline, and resources required for the migration. The plan should include a detailed assessment of the current environment, an analysis of the expected benefits and risks, and a step-by-step plan for migrating to Mule 4.

Phase 3: Adopt Build and Innovate

During this phase, the organization begins to implement the migration plan that was established in the strategy phase. The Adopt, Build, and Innovate phase is an iterative process that involves continuous development, testing, and refinement to ensure that the new platform meets the organization's evolving needs.

• Define Best Practise and templates (optional – recommended)

Defining best practices and templates is an important part of promoting consistency, saving time, improving quality, ensuring compliance, and sharing knowledge across development teams.

• Restructure and modernize API implementations (optional – recommended)

Define a systematic approach to building robust applications following common architectural patterns like: orchestration, transformation, routing, data mapping and connectivity across systems. Starting from the existing specification (API assets), carefully plan and execute each step in the implementation process to ensure that the API meets the requirements.

Phase 4: Migration deployment

The Migration Deployment phase is critical to the success of the MuleSoft 4 migration project, as it ensures that the new system is fully operational, delivers the expected benefits, and meets the needs of the organization. The migration team will work closely with stakeholders to ensure that the new platform meets all of the organization's requirements and that any issues that arise during the deployment are addressed promptly.

• Define a clear deployment plan

Before starting the deployment process, it is important to have a clear deployment plan that outlines the steps involved in the deployment process, including the deployment target, configuration settings, and deployment tools.

• Automate the deployment process (optional – recommended)

Automating the deployment process can help to minimize errors and reduce deployment time. This can be done using deployment tools such as Anypoint Platform or a continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipeline.

• Test and validate the migration

Develop a comprehensive testing plan that covers all aspects of the migration,including integration testing, regression testing, and performance testing. This will help to validate that the migrated integrations are functioning correctly and meeting the expected performance metrics.

• Develop a rollout plan to Production

Develop a rollout plan that outlines how the migrated integrations will be rolled out to production. This may involve a phased rollout to minimize the impact on users and to address any issues that arise during the rollout.

Phase 5: Monitor and governor

The Monitor and Govern phase is an ongoing process that takes place after the MuleSoft 4 migration is complete. In this phase, the organization must continually monitor and manage the new system to ensure that it performs as expected and meets the needs of the business and in addition, train the internal team on how to use the new system effectively. The Monitor and Govern phase is a critical component of the MuleSoft 4 migration process, as it ensures that the new platform delivers ongoing value and remains aligned with the organization's evolving needs.

• Monitor and optimize the migrated integrations (optional)

Monitor the performance of the migrated integrations and optimize them as necessary to ensure that they are meeting the expected performance metrics.

• Document and share

Create clear and comprehensive documentation that outlines the API's purpose, functionality, and usage of the new architecture, provide a clear understanding of the API ecosystem to developers, operation teams, and end-users, focused on what has been modified

• Training

Provide education and training on how to manage the new MuleSoft ecosystem, describing development process, new best practices for designing and building APIs, and how to use MuleSoft 4 tools and features.

A successful migration to Mule 4 requires a detailed assessment of the current environment, careful planning and execution, and ongoing monitoring and optimization. By following these steps, the organizations can take advantage of the benefits of Mule 4 and improve their integration capabilities.

Phase 1: Discovery and Assessment

This phase has been proven to be the most critical for the success of the overall migration.

Due to this consideration the approach for its completion has been detailed in this dedicated paragraph.

All the assessments will be collected and reported in a review document split per area of interest:

Section Tab	Description
Platform Architecture	Focused on the configuration of the Anypoint platform
Asset and Mulesoft architecture	Focused application architecture as well as other systems as part of the application landscape
Use case	Focused on the use case and business integration flows to be migrated
implementations and code review	Focused on the code review including recommendations on improving the efficiency and maintainability of the system.

The following table will be used to highlight the assessment and rating of each reviewed indicator in a visual manner:

Rating %	Description
90% – 100%	A component with this rating is unlikely to significantly affect the migration process. This may be because the component is not critical to the overall architecture, or because it is relatively straightforward to migrate. While some work may be required to update the component, it is not expected to cause significant delays or issues.
60% – 90%	A component with this rating is moderately important to the migration process. This may be because the component is used in several integrations or because it requires some degree of customization or configuration. While the migration of this component may not be overly complex, it will require some effort and attention to ensure that it is migrated successfully.
30% – 60%	A component with this rating  is likely to significantly affect the migration process. This may be because the component is used in critical integrations, or because it requires significant customization or configuration. Migrating this component will require significant time and effort, and may cause some delays and disruptions. Careful planning and testing will be necessary to ensure that the component is migrated successfully.
0% – 30%	A component with this rating is likely to have a severe impact on the migration process. This may be because the component is critical to the overall architecture or because it requires extensive customization or configuration. Migrating this component will require significant resources and may cause significant delays and disruptions to existing operations. In some cases, it may be necessary to consider alternative solutions or workarounds if the component cannot be migrated successfully.

A higher rating value indicates a lower migration effort  and conversely a lower rating means a higher complexity and greater impacts to the migration

Furthermore, an overall rating will be quantified by calculating a weighted average of all the indicators, helping to estimate the whole migration effort and identify gaps that must to be addressed in the migration design phase.

Platform Architecture Assessment

A platform architecture assessment is particularly important during a MuleSoft migration because it will drive the design decision of the new architecture ensuring that the Mulesoft 4 applications will be well-designed and capable of meeting the needs of the customer.

The platform will be evaluated against the following areas:

• Appliance
• Access Management
• Networking
• Monitoring

The current As-is configuration is compared with the desired to-be architecture and a rating score is calculated considering the impact and complexity of the transition, as describedabove, a higher rating value indicates a lower migration effort.

The following exhibit is a summary of the related tab of the Migration Assessment Document:

Ass. area	Ass. Subjects	As-is	To-be	Rating %	Findings
Appliance	Deployment Model	Cloudhub	Cloudhub	100%	No impacts
	Platform version	Cloudhub 1.0	Cloudhub 1.0	100%	No impacts
	Managed extra Tools	e.g. AnypointMQ, Titanium monitoring, ELK, etc…	Same	100%	No impacts
Access Management	Business Groups	Only 1 main BG	No change	100%	easy scenario with a single BG
	Environments	3 SBX ENVS and 1 PROD env	No change	90%	Relative easy configuration
	External Identity Providers	Azure AD for SSO	Azure AD for SSO, no change	100%	should be no impacts
	External Client Providers	Not in use	Not in use	100%	no impact
	Roles, User and Teams	No teams and no custom roles	No change required	100%	no impact
	Connected Apps	External user managed by common user without MFA	External user MUST be managed by connected apps	20%	Need to migrate all the user as connected app, refactor application code and CI/CD pipelines
Networking	VNPs	2 VPN with Tunnel IPsec to the on-premises datacenter	same	100%	common configuration, no major  impact
	Transient Gateways	No transient Gateway	same	100%	no impact
	VPCs	1 SBX VPC and a dedicated Prod VPC	same	100%	no impact
	Load Balancing	1 SBX DLB and a dedicated Prod DLB	Same	70%	no version in the current routing, possible impacts on the api consumers
Monitoring	Logging	No log centralization, log view on the specific Cloudhub app	Same	100%	no impacts
	Alerting	No platform alerts, but though SMTP connector	Same	70%	Need to migrate the SMTP connector
	Insights	Insight as Cloudhub notifications	Same	100%	Need to migrate Cloudhub connector
	Visualizer	well configured by cloudhub properties	Same	80%	Impacts on CI/CD, Properties must be managed by maven plugin

Assets and Mulesoft Architecture

Reviewing assets and Mulesoft architecture is an important step for managing a Mulesoft 4 migration, it helps to ensure that existing integrations and the whole ecosystem are properly designed and can be successfully migrated to the new version. This allows for a smoother transition with fewer errors and less downtime. Additionally, it provides an opportunity to identify and address any potential issues or areas for improvement in the architecture before the migration takes place.

The Application landscape will be evaluated against the following area ofinterest:

• API-led connectivity
• Exchange Assets
• API Manager
• External Systems
• API Lifecycle

The assessment starts with the discovery of the existing landscape and then assesses the impacts to migrate to the new architecture, as described above, a higher rating value indicates a lower migration effort.

The following exhibit is a summary of the related tab of the Migration Assessment Document:

Ass. Area	Ass. Subject	AS-IS Discovery	Rating %	Findings
API-led connectivity	Reusability of the APIs	good level of reuse, some applications have a gross-granularity	80%	no major impact, probably some apps will be broken down further
	Level of authentication and authorization	basic auth between mule apps	90%	evaluate whether to improve security, otherwise easy to migrate
	Encryption of data in transit	communication between apps in clear (http)	70%	strongly recommended to secure with TLS, requires self-sign certificates, …
	Dedicated experience API per consumer	1 exp app per API consumer	100%	no major impact
	Dedicated system API per target system	mule apps split by functional object instead target system	10%	sys mule apps integrate multiple systems and technologies, changes on a system impact multiple applications, need to be refactored
	Dedicated process API per functional domains	correct BSN domain and endpoint segregation	100%	no impacts
	Existing documentation	Clear documentation	50%	need to be updated after sys layer refactoring
Exchange Assets	Asset census	No extra documentation	100%	No impact, assets well describe themself
	API fragment externalization	APi fragment not defined	20%	Common traits and datatype replicated in every API asset, need to be redesign, this impacts all the API Design Center assets
	Dataweave modules externalization	No Dataweave modules	80%	Evaluate whether if it is appropriate to define
	API Templates	Well defined templates	100%	Mule4 will reuse existing api templates
	Implementation templates	Well defined templates projects	100%	Positive effects to design mule4 templates
	Custom Connectors	No custom connectors	100%	No impact
	Asset Documentation	Every asset has extra documentation, bsn process	100%	Positive effects
API Manager	Existing Policies Custom	Oauth 2.0 introspection	85%	Migrate to the existing Mule OAuth Provider Policy
		Metrics forwarding ELK	20%	High risk of null pointer with the new threading model Mule 4
	Automated Policies	no policies	100%	no impacts
	Client Applications and contracts	describe client and contracts	100%	no impacts, implementation will inherit the existing API instances
External Systems	Logica view	Old version, missing several systems	40%	Need to be
	External system census	Complete and detailed list	100%	Positive effects
	Governance and control	well define, get access to every system in the landscape	100%	No impacts
API Lifecycle	SMC technologies	Azure DevOps Repo	90%	No major impact, new repository in a dedicated folder
	Branching Model	Java JGitFlow	100%	no impact, reuse same model
	CI /CD	Azure DevOps Pipeline	100%	no impact, reuse existing pipelines
	Artifactory Repository	Azure DevOps Artifact	100%	no impact, reuse same groupId

 

Use Cases

The main goal of this phase is to review all the use cases and related Business Integrations Flows.

The first step is to identify all the business use cases and group the corresponding implemented integrations into domains. This review is focused on identifying any changes that may be required to support these use cases and related integrations in Mulesoft runtime version 4.

For every Usecase, the following information are collected:  

• Business Domains
• Integration Scope
• Business Requirements

And besides, the related integrations are review against the following
metrics:

• Technical Requirement
• Service Level Agreement
• Data Quality
• Performance and Scalability
• Security and Compliance
• Integration Patterns
• Test Data Preparation
• Performance Testing
• Security Testing
• Regression Testing
• Automation Testing
• Reporting and Analysis
• Existing Documentation

The following exhibit is a summary of the related tab of the Migration Assessment Document:

Use case	Ass. Area	Ass. Subject	Rating %	Findings	Overall %
Customer Data alignment	General	Business Domains	100%	Account and Customer objects	77,69%
		Integration Scope	100%	Integrations between Salesforce API and SAP RFC ABAP….
		Business Requirements	40%	No BSN req. found
	Integration Flow 1: Account Lookup	Technical Requirement	90%	Clear technical requirement distributed across exchange and sharepoint documentation	86,92%
		Service Level Agreement	100%	Clear SLA, properly reported in the Sharepoint documentation
		Data Quality	100%	Accurate, and consistent data, clear transformation and data enrichments
		Performance and Scalability	70%	3 applications need to be scaled, high vCore consumption
		Security and Compliance	100%	OAuth2 + 2 way SSL configured on the DLBs, no major impacts on the migration
		Integration Patterns	90%	Synch API and caching strategy applied as API manager policy, no major impact
		Test Data Preparation	90%	Clear test data, unit test reuse RAML specification and properly documented on exchange
		Integration test	70%	Incomplete tests, only few case are tested
		Performance Testing	90%	Performance test with JMeter and Postman
		Security Testing	40%	No security testing, has to be implemented
		Regression Testing	100%	comprehensive regression test library on postman
		Reporting and Analysis	100%	Unit test result stored on dedicated sharepoint folder, reused in mule4 without impacts
		Existing Documentation	90%	Clear documentation distributed across exchange and sharepoint documentation
	Integration Flow 2: Customer Creation	Technical Requirement	30%	No clear requirements, need reverse engineering	68,46%
		Service Level Agreement	20%	No SLA defined, must be evaluated directly in the code
		Data Quality	100%	Accurate, and consistent data, clear transformation and data enrichments
		Performance and Scalability	80%	Process layer can be scaled only vertically
		Security and Compliance	70%	Secured implementation, but sensitive data logged in clear
		Integration Patterns	70%	scheduled batch with batch scope and record aggregation
		Test Data Preparation	50%	Clear data only for happy path
		Performance Testing	90%	Proper testing in UAT enviroment
		Performance Testing	90%	Proper testing in UAT enviroment
		Security Testing	70%	No security testing, however no major impacts
		Regression Testing	100%	comprehensive regression test library on postman
		Reporting and Analysis	100%	Unit test result stored on dedicated sharepoint folder, reused in mule4 without impacts
		Existing Documentation	20%	poor documentation on Exchange, no sharepoint documents

 

 

Implementation & Code Review

This is the last phase of the assessment process, every Mule app will be reviewed against a set of evaluation metrics in order to estimate the development effort of the new Mule 4 codebase, identify impacts, and mitigate potential issues that could arise during the migration process, such as deprecated features, incompatibilities, and performance bottlenecks. Furthermore, a code review provides an opportunity to optimize the application's performance, security, and scalability in the new Mule 4 environment

The following exhibit is a summary of the related tab of the Migration Assessment Document:

Mule Apps	Assessment area	Rating %	Findings	Overall %
sys-salesforce-api	API Specification (RAML/OAS)	100%	Clear RAML specification, no change required	66%
	Nr of API endpoints	50%	About 10 synch enpoints
	Nr of Flows and reuse	90%	relatively simple implementation, about one flow per endpoint
	Integration patterns	100%	Only synch APIs
	APIkit to manage APIs	0%	no apikit, dedicated http listener per endpoint
	EE Connectors	80%	Salesforce connector HTTP requester connector
	Custom connectors	100%	no custom connectors
	Java classes / Groovy scripts	60%	Found a java class to calculate JWT token, should be migrated to DW2
	Nr of unit tests	0%	NO unit tests, should be implemented
	Test coverage	0%	Coverage 0%
	Complexity	90%	Easy implementation with few flow processors
	Anti patterns	100%	No anti patterns found
	Logging	100%	Common logger connector, no extra configuration, easy to be migrated
	Error Handling	100%	Externalized error handling and reuse for all the flow
	Existing Documentation	20%	Found just an high level description of the API endoints

These are some of the topics that will be covered during the MuleSoft code review phase. However, the list may vary depending on the specific requirements and architecture of the application in exam.

Every assessment area will be appointed with a percentage rating, the average percentage of all these indicators will provide a first rough estimation of the complexity to migrate the Mule application under scrutiny.

Moreover, considering that during the migration the code will be almost completely rewritten, this would be the right time to identify any issues and technical debts that must (or should) be arranged.

 

Overall Consideration

In conclusion, migrating to MuleSoft 4 can offer significant benefits, such as enhanced performance, increased scalability, and improved developer productivity.

However, the migration process requires careful planning, execution, and ongoing maintenance to ensure a successful outcome.

It is essential to approach the migration process as a multi-phased project that includes all the steps described in this document.

Regarding the use of the MuleSoft Migration Assistant, it is a tool that can help simplify certain aspects of the migration process. However, it is not a complete solution, and it has limitations that make it less than ideal for some use cases. For example, the Migration Assistant may not work well for complex integrations or custom-built components. Additionally, the Migration Assistant does not provide a comprehensive migration plan or address all the aspects of a successful migration project. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the benefits and limitations of the Migration Assistant carefully and determine if it is the best approach for your specific migration needs.

In conclusion, migrating to Mule 4 can be a complex and challenging process. This document has provided valuable information and guidance to help you navigate this transition successfully. However, if you find that you need additional assistance, we are here to help!

Our consulting services are designed to support you every step of the way, from planning to execution, to ensure a smooth and efficient migration to Mule 4 tailored to your organization's unique needs.

Reach us out:  info@florencenext.com